Pediatric Audiology Requires a Degree of Competence

Image
Jane Madell
February 19, 2019

I have had three upsetting experiences in the last few weeks about pediatric audiology. All involved incompetence. I will confess right from the start that I am not tolerant of incompetence. If you ask people who have worked with me they will confirm this.

When it comes to a child’s future, incompetence seems unacceptable.

 

Pediatric Audiology Requires Competence

 

The first situation was a family who had a one year old who failed newborn hearing screening and had been seen by three audiologists who had different diagnoses in the year since failing screening. I asked mom to send me all the test results. At 8 months of age this little guy had an ABR and a behavioral test in one center. The audiologist read the ABR as normal and the behavioral test indicated a moderately severe hearing loss.

The audiologist told them to come back in 3 months. I was very glad the mother wasn’t sitting in front of me because I went berserk.

First of all, the audiologist read the ABR wrong. It clearly indicated hearing loss. I sent it to another audiologist to look at and she confirmed that it clearly indicated hearing loss. Second, behavioral testing is the gold standard, so if behavioral testing indicates hearing loss you move very quickly. Third, if you have inconsistent test results on a child you bring them back tomorrow to determine what is wrong and, if you cannot solve the problem, you refer to someone else.

YOU DO NOT SAY COME BACK IN THREE MONTHS WHEN TRYING TO DETERMINE IF A CHILD HAS A HEARING LOSS.

In this case the child had a moderately severe hearing loss and a year has been wasted.

The second situation happened with two different children. One was a three year old who failed newborn screening, was referred for diagnostic evaluation, was fit with hearing aids and there everything stopped. Neither the audiologist or this child’s pediatrician referred this child for any other testing. No one referred this child to early intervention, for a speech-language evaluation, for auditory-verbal therapy, for a psycho-educational evaluation etc.

This mom had done everything she was told to do for her child. She was horrified when she discovered that there were other things that she should have, and could have done to help her child. She felt very guilty but it wasn’t her fault. She is not an expert in pediatric hearing loss but the audiologist who has been following this child and the pediatrician are supposed to be experts.

At least this child had hearing aid but he did not have the therapy he should have had and, as a result, his language is more delayed than it would have been if he had had appropriate referrals and services.

The third situation is similar to the second one. I was asked to help with a child who was in kindergarten, with an identified hearing loss, who was not doing well. I went to school and the first thing I did was listen to his hearing aids. Neither one was working.

So this little guy had a hearing loss (moderate it turns out) and he has earmolds stuffing up his ears in addition to the hearing loss. I spoke with the mom. Her son was seen by a pediatric audiologist who identified the hearing loss after he failed newborn hearing screening, fit the hearing aids and that was that. Mom was told to return once a year.

She was not told to check the hearing aids every morning to be sure they were working, she was not referred for early intervention, speech-language, auditory-verbal, or psycho-educational evaluations. When he got to school age no one told her that her son was entitled to a school evaluation, that he should have an FM system in school, etc.

A fourth situation happened two years ago. I was asked to consult about a little girl who was finishing 1st grade and was not doing well. Lots of people had messed up in this case. She had failed newborn hearing screening but there were other problems including problems swallowing and no one followed up with the hearing loss.

She was seen by a speech-language pathologist for swallowing. Neither the SLP or the pediatrician referred this family for audiological evaluation even though she had a significant speech-language delay. When she went for her 5 year old annual checkup the dad suggested that mom discuss hearing with the pediatrician because he did not think she heard well. The pediatrician agreed to a referral to an ENT. A moderately severe hearing loss was identified and she was fit with hearing aids.

The audiologist in the ENT office told the mom that the little girls hearing loss was “not bad enough for her to need an FM system”, no one referred her to an auditory-verbal therapist or a speech-language pathologist who specialized in children with hearing loss. The school did not arrange for a tri-annual evaluation, nor did they offer teacher of the deaf services to help with academics.

 

So, what do kids with hearing loss actually need?

 

The services that a child with hearing loss receive will make a difference in the child’s life so we need to be very very clear about what children need. Here is my bare bones list. It is only a start but, in my view, everything on this list is critical.

 

  1. Early diagnosis – Hearing loss in children is a neurologic emergency. If there is any question about the hearing loss a child should be referred to another audiologist for a 2nd Testing should be accomplished very quickly. “Come back in 3 months” is never acceptable when you do not know if hearing loss is present or the degree of hearing loss.
  2. Fit technology quickly – If families choose listening and spoken language, it is essential that the child be fit with appropriate technology quickly and that the technology provides the child with access to audition sufficient to provide good auditory brain development.
  3. Routine audiological follow-up – My recommendations are that kids with hearing loss be seen every 3 months until age 4, every six months until age middle school, then annually.
  4. Families need to understand the importance of using technology EVERY WAKING HOUR. If children wear technology 4 hours/day it will take them 6 years to hear what a typical hearing child hears in one year. They need to understand the importance of hearing for development of language and literacy
  5. Families need direction to assist in developing language in their children with hearing loss. They need referral to an auditory verbal therapist or a speech-language pathologist with experience in teaching listening and spoken language to children with hearing loss. Families are their child’s primary teachers but they need direction.
  6. Psycho-educational evaluations will assist in determining if a child has any other learning concerns which should be addressed
  7. Medical evaluations including genetics, ophthalmology, and others as needed.
  8. Once children reach school age remote microphone systems should be provided for all academic classes, teacher of the deaf services should be provided for preview and review of all academic subjects, speech-language services, and other services are needed.

 

REMEMBER THIS IS A BARE BONE LIST. WHILE THE THINGS ON THIS LIST ARE ESSENTIAL, DIFFERENT CHILD WITH NEED DIFFERENT ADDITIONAL THINGS.

  1. This is horrific. I saw the long term effects of this early in my career. That it continues today is inexcusable. We have so many resources available to help these children and their families. On a positive note, someone reached out to you for assistance!
    We have to keep on educating the world. And it is sad when this occurs close to home.

  2. Sounds like some very lazy audiologists in government controlled PA settings. one would not see these practices in private settings.Jane is right in going ballistic. Her tips are excellent!

  3. “teacher of the deaf services should be provided for preview and review of all academic subjects” this is wishful thinking. This is often pushed onto parents.

    1. Jane Madell Author

      The fact that it is difficult to get the service does not mean that we should not be insisting on it. If we don;t it will never happen

  4. I have been screaming about this all of my career before NIHS became a reality. I remember a audiology masters student telling me there was no difference in testing a child vs an adult. I did become ballistic and told her in no uncertain terms (and all the others at the lunch table) to do me a favor and NEVER try to test children as she didn’t get it and obviously did not have the skills or wherewithal to be a competent pediatric audiologist. I told her that her attitude made it more difficult for me to get the children the complete and total testing and rehab that they needed and to do herself a favor and refer whenever she was asked to see anyone classified as a child. I do not know what happened to her and the program was dissolved several years later. I just hope that they are unable to open an AuD program here in California.

  5. Pediatric audiologists don’t seem to realize they are the first experts parents meet. If they don’t teach about daily management of hearing equipment and the why behind it, and refer to early intervention and parent to parent support, these are the results they will get with children each and every time. Inexcusable.

  6. This is horrible. Everyone says they are an expert with their certificates on the wall for all to see. Doesn’t matter the setting you’re in. Its about the person him/her self that is causing the problem. When this happens you have profound chain reactions that will take place with the child. This is something that I feel that some audiologists don’t understand. Thanks Madell for speaking out and good luck in dealing with this issue.

  7. Thank you for this! Unfortunately it all happens too often, sometimes from the most well-intentioned audiologists who are limited by bureaucracy of big health systems that don’t allow for urgent appointments. I saw a child who was diagnosed with a mild to moderate hearing loss and was given a follow up appointment for six weeks later. Luckily the parents didn’t sit and wait around, instead brought it upon themselves to look for alternative clinic.

  8. Yep. I was that kid with hearing loss that didn’t get adequate services. My ENT/AUD didn’t correctly identify my type of hearing loss (reverse slope) and attributed the loss to chronic ear infections. Tubes didn’t do anything to help, and I never received any services in school. I struggled to hear in school until I learned how to lip read on my own. Now I’m 32 and working on my PhD in Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, and I have a toddler of my own. I just learned the name of my hearing loss a few days ago thanks to an AUD at my university. I’m furious at my old doctors for not giving me the right kind of support, but I’m moving forward with a new AUD. It’s been 30 years since I was first diagnosed with hearing loss. It is so important to identify and treat hearing loss in children with the utmost urgency.

  9. A world renowned hospital in Boston which specializes in ENT missed my daughter’s hearing loss even after 3 audiological tests over a period of one year. Her private speech therapist encouraged me to obtain a 2nd option at a pediatric world renowned hospital which diagnosed her on the first visit with moderate to severe hearing loss at the ripe age of 4. They fast tracked her and today, at the ripe age of 11, is doing fantastic. She has EVA – and passed her newborn screening. Our theory is that while learning to walk she was falling all the time and bumped her head many times…..her speech was moving along up until age 18 months – she learned to walk at 15 months.

    What I found out later is that the world renowned ENT hospital does not do well with pediatric audiology. I heard similar stories after connecting with others who have children with hearing loss who used to frequent this hospital – operative word – “used to.” A friend of mine, who also used to work at this hospital, admitted to me she didn’t like evaluating pediatric patients.

    Never accept the status quo and seek answers if something doesn’t seem right.

Leave a Reply