Survey finds consumer demand for water-, dust-proof hearing aids

David Kirkwood
June 28, 2011

PISCATAWAY, NJ—A survey of 500 hearing aid wearers, conducted by Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc., showed that many of them want more robust products that can better hold up during swimming and other activities that they want to enjoy without giving up their ability to communicate.

According to the study, hearing-impaired Americans want to lead a more vibrant daily life, but feel restricted by their hearing devices.

The Siemens survey, which was released last week, found that for fear of water damage to their hearing aids, wearers refrain from activities they would otherwise enjoy, such as swimming, lounging in the pool, or soaking in a hot tub. A third of respondents state that wearing their hearing device on a day with adverse weather conditions directly affects their routine.

Many hearing aid wearers avoid wearing hearing aids when doing activities, such as like woodworking, farming, and construction, that might expose them to dust or dirt.

About 53% of respondents expressed interest in sturdier hearing aids, better capable of handling a broader range of environmental situations. When asked about specific hearing aid attributes, more than 70% of respondents expressed interest in a waterproof device, with 63% and 60%, respectively, interested in shock-resistant and dustproof qualities.

Siemens released the survey results in conjunction with the introduction of Aquaris (www.usa.siemens.com/aquaris), which it describes as “the first truly waterproof, dustproof, and shock-resistant hearing aid.”Infographic-SiemensHearing-FINAL

According to the company, the new hearing aid’s housing is constructed from a single piece and features watertight seals and membranes. As a result, Siemens says, Aquaris can be submerged in water up to 3 feet for 30 minutes without damage to the instrument.

 

  1. I am amazed, frustrated, and disgusted with aid manufacturers who apparently ignored the fact that very active buyers of expensive advanced hearing enhancers would create perspiration during busy, normal lives…..sweat sufficient to render the aids little more than multi-chiming, maddening, useless gadgets hanging on/in one’s ears. One wonders how, or if, these giant purveyors of electronic disappointments will equitably deal with countless of us who were not advised of the manufacturers’ blatant failure to account for and/or warn about the human body’s creation of perspiration sufficient to “kill” the function of the expensive product. Don’t overlook the possibility of class action lawsuits, particularly when very vocal and angry seniors get organized about any given issue.

Leave a Reply