Michael J. Metz, PhD, has been a practicing audiologist for more than 45 years, and has taught in several university settings. In partnership with Bob Sandlin, they provided continuing education for audiology and dispensing in California for more than two decades.
Featured image for “Comments on the FTC Hearing of April 18, 2017”
Aug. 08, 2017

Comments on the FTC Hearing of April 18, 2017

Mike Metz
It would have been unrealistic for most audiologists to have attended or listened to the entire FTC hearing on April 18th involving over-the-counter and self-fit hearing devices.  Without attendance, many might be left with incomplete summaries or biased opinions.  You should spend some time watching the day’s activities.  If you can’t watch, here are some biased thoughts on what I
Featured image for “Audiologists, beware: Today’s assistant can become your competitor tomorrow”
Jul. 25, 2017

Audiologists, beware: Today’s assistant can become your competitor tomorrow

Mike Metz
Editor’s note: In light of the coming audiology storm, this short piece by Professor Roeser has as much relevance today as it did when it appeared at HearingHealthMatters on August 22, 2012.  One should consider this position in reference to “big box” practices as well as the rehabilitative tasks that audiology has been favorably arguing for at least the past five
Featured image for “Who’s a Snitch? (Tough Love)”
Jul. 11, 2017

Who’s a Snitch? (Tough Love)

Mike Metz
I heard a story the other day about an audiologist who bills in a threatening manner. Without going into specifics, this audiologist reportedly over-bills, submitting for tests that appear unnecessary (billed for almost every patient) or redundant (fails to add clinical value). Obviously, this is a case of attempting to make investigational testing cost-effective. Is this action illegal or unethical?
Featured image for “Discussion on A Gold Standard”
Jul. 04, 2017

Discussion on A Gold Standard

Mike Metz
The  June 13, 2017 post entitled “A Gold Standard” elicited a nice response from Mark Ashmore: (His) Comment: Quite clearly Pure Tone Audiometry does not deserve to be referred to as “Gold Standard”. It is flawed as a result of outdated calibration methods, outdated hardware, poor execution and over reliance on the test by too many. Having said that, the
Featured image for “Are OTC Hearing Aids and PSAPs Targets for the Next Product Liability/Negligence Suits?”
Jun. 27, 2017

Are OTC Hearing Aids and PSAPs Targets for the Next Product Liability/Negligence Suits?

Mike Metz
by Granville Y Brady Jr, AuD This post explores the use of PSAPs and OTC hearing aids used to treat hearing difficulty and the possible liability incurred when these devices fail to meet a patient’s expectations or cause the patient to be harmed. Some consumers who purchase PSAP’s and OTC’s will likely consult an audiologist to assist them with the
Featured image for “A Gold Standard”
Jun. 13, 2017

A Gold Standard

Mike Metz
For any audiologist who watched the FTC hearings on April 15th, you will recall the mention of audiology’s “gold standard” a number of times by the members of the first on-stage panel.  For those who didn’t watch, some on the panel seemed to imply that pure tone thresholds are the gold standard for hearing.   The Declining Price of Gold
Featured image for “War’s disabled survivors must also be remembered—and helped”
May. 29, 2017

War’s disabled survivors must also be remembered—and helped

Mike Metz
The following post from David Kirkwood holds as much value today as it did 5 years ago.  It is especially cogent when read in the light of the recent FTC public hearing regarding patient education and empowerment.  Sage advice usually stays in style.   By David H. Kirkwood, June 6 2012 Memorial Day was established as an occasion to honor