To Be or Not To Be an Audiologist

Investing in a doctoring degree in Audiology hinges on expectations and outcomes that should be anchored in real data.  We’re not there yet, but discussing it is a start.  Last week left off here:

 it boils down to  doing a self-examination of expectations and anticipations in order to forecast whether the graduate degree is a good or poor investment.  The wannabe Audiologist’s  rational consumption choice is supposed to maximize her Utility by a selective process in which she chooses the best opportunity available and within her budget.  Does it?

 

 To which Kevin Liebe, AuD responded by referencing his recent article on Audiology Students’ Views:

I think the particularly damning statement on the subject of AuD education and ROI is from Chasity Moore, when she says that some students in her undergraduate program interested in audiology chose to become SLPs instead because, “it takes less time, the days off are better and they often make more money.” Ouch!  

 

OK, Chasity and Kevin. It’s a long process to collect enough data to attempt rational consumption decision-making on this topic.  I promised some numbers and we’ll start today with Growth and see how those number stack up in Chasity’s analysis.

 

Growth in Health-Related Occupations and Professions

 

Some professions are growing, others are dying off.  We don’t need the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to tell us that becoming the village blacksmith is out, but who knew that holistic medicine is a dead end these days?  So says Forbes Magazines list of 10 “top” dying professions.  I wouldn’t have guessed.

Audiology is not dying but it’s also not among the top 20 Fastest Growing Occupations, according to the BLS.  But a disproportionate number of health-related “assisting” occupations are in the top ranks (Table 1). It may not be so great to make that list:  in general, occupations that pay the least are growing fastest, although sonographers do well on both counts.  None of the vocations require anything close to a doctoral degree.  

 

Occupations

Growth rate, 2010-2020

2010 Median Pay

Medical Secretaries

41%

30.53K

OT Assistants

43%

51.01K

Dx Medical Sonographers

44%

64.38K

PT Assistants

46%

$49.69K

Veterinary Techs

52%

$29.71K

Home health aides

70%

20.56K

Personal Care Aides

70%

19.64K

Table 1. Selected Occupations from BLS Fastest Growing Occupations

 

Some argue that professions of the type shown in Table 1 are complementary and necessary to doctoring professions such as Audiology.  The arguments have validity but they are counter-weighted by opposing arguments that these lower-paid, growing legions are our future competitors because “support” need not imply “supervised.

Indeed, Christine Diles, AuD/Hearing Aid Dispenser made the point last year in a compelling post that contrasted doctoral level Audiologists with hearing aid dispensers.  On the assumption that Audiologists with doctorates will survive the onslaught and not go the way of the village blacksmith, let’s shift the focus to licensed healthcare professions.

Folks Like Us

 

Physical Therapy is the only doctoring profession to makes the “top 20” cut for growth — it comes in 20th.  Table 2 compares data from that profession to Audiologists, OTs and SLPs. Despite being one of the two doctoral-level professions represented in the table, Audiologists come in last on wages, number of jobs, and projected increase in actual number of jobs.  We’re also Lilliputians among giants in the table.

 

Audiologist

Speech-Language-Pathologist

Occupational Therapist

Physical Therapists

Median Pay 2010

$66,660

$66,920

$72,320

$76,310

Entry-Level Education

Doctoral

Master’s

Master’s

Doctoral

Number of Jobs

13,000

123,200

108,800

198,600

2010-2020 Growth

37%

23%

33%

39%

Projected New  Jobs, 2010-2020

4,800

28,800

36,400

77,400

 

Table 2.  BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook Summaries of 3 Professions.

 

  Back to Chasity’s analysis.  She was on the right path but didn’t have enough numbers to hit the mark.  By her measures of time spent and money made, she should consider switching to OT or sonography.   As far as time-off, I didn’t find any numbers comparing that metric among professions, but I’m happy to get them from anyone who wants to chime in.

There are so many metrics that come into play, I welcome help and direction from readers.  No doubt, someone like myself finds enormous satisfaction in being an Audiologist and would probably do it for no pay, long hours, and years of schooling.  Come to think of it, I have done so in lean times.  I’m sure others have as well.  Those of us who have chosen the Audiology path derive significant Utility from our career preference.  Younger people who are considering Audiology for their future deserve to hear from you!

Next post in this series will look at Growth and Gender effects.

 

Editor’s Note:  Only after publishing this post did I discover that Chuck Berlin, PhD, had already snagged the catchy title in an article he wrote for American Journal of Audiology back in 1992.  It’s not available unless you are an ASHA member (a characteristic of special interest groups that irritates economists) but here’s the link in case you are.

photo courtesy of tumblr



About Holly Hosford-Dunn

Holly Hosford-Dunn, PhD, graduated with a BA and MA in Communication Disorders from New Mexico State, completed a PhD in Hearing Sciences at Stanford, and did post-docs at Max Planck Institute (Germany) and Eaton-Peabody Auditory Physiology Lab (Boston). Post-education, she directed the Stanford University Audiology Clinic; developed multi-office private practices in Arizona; authored/edited numerous text books, chapters, journals, and articles; and taught Marketing, Practice Management, Hearing Science, Auditory Electrophysiology, and Amplification in a variety of academic settings.

1 Comment

  1. I think if anything, this data shows us that the audiology profession needs to clearly define what an audiology aide or technician is and what they can and cant’ do. Clearly when someone can spend about a year and become a HAD (or less), why would they become an aide, unless it was on-the-job training?

    I think it’s pretty pathetic that the median pay of audiologists is so close to what some other professional aides are making. Wow! I’m pretty sure it didn’t take them 8 years to become an assistant.

Comments are closed.