Thoughts/Observations About Hearing Aids and Earwax (Cerumen)
Increased Cerumen Production
It is well known that individuals who have never worn hearing aids often show increased cerumen production when hearing aids are first worn. As a result, hearing aids and earwax are part and parcel of each other, even if that is not a preferred association. This initial increase in cerumen production should not be surprising, especially as the ceruminous glands release their contents, acting in protective function. However, the intensity of this secretion release seems to drop off within a relatively short time after wearing hearing aids. And, this does not necessarily result in impacted cerumen.
Hearing Aid/Earmold Shape and Cerumen
The shape of the ear insert (hearing aid, earmold, or other) would seem to have an effect with respect to cerumen buildup. Carrot-shaped (tapered) designs with smooth surfaces suggest that existing cerumen could be forced to the sides, and would not provide much in terms of cerumen sticking to them when withdrawn (Figure 1).
On the other hand, those inserts having a fuller and/or more deeply fitted, and especially if the tip consists of fins or an umbrella shape (Figure 2), would appear to help remove cerumen upon withdrawn1,2. This is especially true if they extend beyond the area where cerumen is produced. In such cases, the earpiece may act as a “cleaning rod” whenever it is inserted and removed, with a thin film of cerumen collecting on the sides of the ear earpiece rather than at its tip. The author’s observation is that such fitted inserts actually help keep an ear canal clean, especially if used consistently. Of course, if substantial cerumen exists upon initial insertion, it can push that more deeply into the ear canal, but that is generally a one-time event.
Any new insertion of a hearing device into an ear canal, regardless of the shape or depth, is likely to extract some cerumen upon withdrawal. This is generally a wetter, or stickier type cerumen.
Cerumen Plug of Hearing Aid Sound Bore
The ear canal has two bends, and although many hearing aids/earmolds do not pass the second bend (but most preferred fits at least look into the second bend), inserting a device often results in the hearing aid/earmold sound bore coming in contact with the canal wall somewhere along the way. And, if cerumen exists in that area, there is a good chance that it will be picked up and enter the sound bore, to varying extents.
Hearing aid engineers attempt to minimize this impact by designing the sound bore openings of the devices to avoid this as much as possible, and/or to provide some kind of wax guard that can be easily replaced, even by the consumer. It has been estimated that as high as 60% of hearing aid repairs are caused by cerumen or a foreign material getting to the internal components of the hearing aid3, especially to the receiver/speaker (Figure 3).
Even if cerumen does not plug the sound bore, it can affect hearing aid performance. Not only can cerumen enter and close the sound bore of a hearing aid, it is even more insidious in the following way. The ear canal has a temperature gradient having its highest temperature closest to the eardrum, and its lowest temperature at the entrance of the ear canal. A hearing aid or earmold in the ear can cause heat build-up, which can cause cerumen to vaporize in the ear canal. If worn for an extended period of time (say greater than about 6 months, although this can vary), it may condense on any cooler object it encounters. And, the coolest element just happens to be the hearing aid speaker/receiver. Figure 4 shows the results of cerumen vaporization on the wax filters of two hearing aids, along with the test results.
There is always a possibility that before a hearing aid can be fitted, removal of excessive or impacted cerumen may need to occur. A following post will address this issue.
- Garcia H, Staab WJ. Solving challenges in deep canal fittings, Part I. The Hearing Review, Bol. 2, No. 1, 34 (1995).
- Staab w. The Philips XP peritympanic hearing aid. Seminars in Hearing, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1996.